Journal article
D. Coyle, R. Macpherson, C. Foy, A. Molodynski, Maya Biju, J. Hayes
2013
2013
Semantic Scholar
DOI
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Coyle, D., Macpherson, R., Foy, C., Molodynski, A., Biju, M., & Hayes, J. (2013). Compulsion in the community: Mental health professionals' views and experiences of CTOs.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Coyle, D., R. Macpherson, C. Foy, A. Molodynski, Maya Biju, and J. Hayes. “Compulsion in the Community: Mental Health Professionals' Views and Experiences of CTOs” (2013).
MLA
Click to copy
Coyle, D., et al. Compulsion in the Community: Mental Health Professionals' Views and Experiences of CTOs. 2013.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{d2013a,
title = {Compulsion in the community: Mental health professionals' views and experiences of CTOs},
year = {2013},
author = {Coyle, D. and Macpherson, R. and Foy, C. and Molodynski, A. and Biju, Maya and Hayes, J.}
}
Abstract
Aims and method We surveyed the views and experiences of all mental health professionals in adult community mental health teams and approved mental health professionals in 2Gether and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trusts, regarding the use of community treatment orders (CTOs). Results A total of 288 surveys were completed (response rate 48%). Forty-eight (83%) psychiatrists and 142 (67%) non-psychiatrist mental health professionals were in favour of CTOs. The decision-making regarding CTOs was overwhelmingly clinically oriented for all professional groups. However, there were significant differences in views between groups regarding the effects of bureaucracy, the infringement of human rights and coercion. Clinical implications Multidisciplinary team involvement is crucial in decisions regarding CTOs and may protect against idiosyncratic or unhelpful practice. Further training for staff is urgently required and there may be a case for creating small local reference groups that can develop expertise and provide advice and support for clinical teams.